The long-standing medical journal calls for a boycott of Chinese organ transplant research

The long-standing medical journal calls for a boycott of Chinese organ transplant research


On April 13, 2021, the British Medical Journal (BMJ), one of the oldest medical journals in the world in the UK, published an article by Mr. Adnan Sharif, a specialist doctor. Kidney and Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham. Mr. Adnan Sharif urged the world organ transplant medical community to boycott organ transplant studies from China to protest and prevent the harvesting of organs from prisoners of conscience due to the Chinese Communist regime. contradiction.

The long-standing medical journal calls for a boycott of Chinese organ transplant research
(Artwork: David Tadevosian / Shutterstock, Royalty-free stock photo)

At the beginning of the article, Mr. Adnan Sharif mentioned the statement of the Independent Court investigating the forced organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience in China, which confirmed that the crime of organ harvesting is a crime against Human beings, and this crime has been, and is likely to be, systematically occurring in China. At the same time, the European, US and Australian parliaments also recognize this claim as credible.

Mr. Adnan Sharif pointed out, organ donation and organ transplantation in China are largely secret. Furthermore, there is research showing that official statistics on organ donation and transplantation are sparse, unverified, and systematically falsified.

Suspicious official data

China used to extract organs from executed prisoners. They denied this, then declared ceasing operations in 2015. The country reports that 19,462 organ transplants from 5,818 donors have died in 2019. At the same time, the number of people themselves The donation registration voluntary was made to be 2.13 million people.

Adnan Sharif said that in any country, only a small fraction of the people who sign up for organ donation die in cases favorable to the donation. In the UK by 2020, out of the 26 million registered people, only 790 donors have died (0.003%). However, the UK system is well established, and the positive public attitude towards this has contributed to an additional 790 unregistered donors. So last year, England had 1,580 people actually donated organs.

Meanwhile in China, the number of registered organ donors is only 2.13 million, but there are 5,818 actual organ donors in 2019. China also has a low history of public support. organ donation and there is no evidence that this has changed. Furthermore, in China, as long as one relative protests, organ donation will be stopped. Japan also has the same cultural obstacles as China to organ donation and has failed for decades to change people’s attitudes despite awareness projects.

Thus, according to Mr. Adnan Sharif, the number of transplants and donations can not only come from the source registered to donate or from a source that has not been registered before but agree to donate. It can be seen that organ transplants in China require another source of organs.

There are more transplants than are publicly available

Not only did the Chinese-published organ transplant data contradict the organ donation system, but the data itself is not reliable, ”said Adnan Sharif. In fact, the evidence of the vast infrastructure and staff dedicated to large-scale organ transplants shows that organ donation and transplantation is far beyond official Chinese figures, with an estimated 90,000 transplants per year. For example, the Tianjin No. 1 Center Hospital alone, one of more than 700 organ transplant facilities in China, has self-declared that its 46,000 square meter organ transplant center has more than 500 beds, enough for thousands of transplants every year.

Additionally, hospital statements of incredibly short wait times and reports of pre-scheduled transplants, have shown that organs are available on request. This can only happen when people know in advance or plan those “Organ donation” dead.

Many prisoners of conscience have described medical examinations at prisons and detention facilities to determine their health and ability to transplant organs. This is also corroborated by Chinese medical staff who ventured to denounce.

Adnan Sharif commented that although he is not Uighur himself or Falun Gong practitioners – who are persecuted for their beliefs in China and have been victims of organ harvesting crimes, he was shocked by the charges of mass murder for forced organ harvesting and truly sympathized with these communities.

Adnan Sharif also pointed out that organ transplants are a super profitable business in China. For example, the 309 Military Medical Hospital in Beijing claims transplant operations make up the highest annual revenue for hospitals, rising from 30 to 230 million yuan between 2006 and 2010.

Organ transplant studies from China may be unethical

With credible allegations and no evidence against them, Mr. Adnan Sharif commented that the international organ transplant community needs to review organ transplant studies from China. The international community’s Istanbul Declaration banned the sale of organs, transplant tourism and the exploitation of donors. It requires the authorities “Accountability for organ donation, distribution and transplantation activities to ensure standardization, traceability, transparency, quality, safety, fairness and public confidence”.

Adnan Sharif pointed out that around the world, there are concerns about illegal transplant tourism and transplant tourism in Egypt, India and the Philippines, but there are no countries as shady as China. China is the only place that has been accused of forced mass organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience, and the activity is backed by the Chinese communist regime. Therefore, the promises made about the reform of the organ transplant system in China are unacceptable and unfounded. Medical journals should refuse to publish and publish scientific research related to organ transplants from China.

Many journals have a policy of refusing transplant research using executed prisoners’ organs. However, according to a study published in BMJ in 2020, more than 90% of 445 Chinese transplant-related studies published from 2000-2017 did not comply with those policies. Hence, journals should be warned about “Complicity and moral hazard”. Some journals subsequently retracted more than 20 articles for this reason.

The aforementioned study resonated, and the study’s lead professor Wendy Rogers was awarded the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Medical Ethics Award, published by The Australia has the largest circulation of Australia voted as the leader in the field of Medical Ethics in Australia, named by Nature magazine as one of the 10 scientists with important contributions, and one of the examples. Medical face of the year 2019 voted by Medscape magazine.

Edited by Minh Nhat

Mr. Adnan Sharif is a Doctor of Kidney and Transplant Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham; is a doctor from the Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK; is a doctor of the Doctors Against Organ Harvesting Organization DAFOH.

See more documentation for the figures and references in the original article here.

Please watch the video:

.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *