MacBook_Air_fed.jpg
Random Tech News

The Apple M1 has changed the definition of performance on a laptop




And the question that we are asking now is no longer whether to take a risk with those machines or not, should we buy it because the Microsoft mirror is still there. No, now the question arises as to what Intel and AMD will do to counter the wave of ARMs that are re-starting.

Intel and AMD for years have been key competitors in the PC and laptop market, they are like playing a game of chess together, with CPU competition, performance inching up every year, then New microarchitectures, new processes, battery life and more … And Apple came along, they completely changed the game of the two big boys. The perfect optimization between Apple’s hardware and software made it successful for the iPhone and iPad, and now it’s the Mac’s turn.

Apple’s ultra-fast and powerful hardware is one thing, of course, but the software behind it carries the deciding factor. Apple’s software works to get the most out of that hardware, far better than optimizing macOS with the x86 architecture that Apple has done over the years. Apple engineer David Smith said that for basic tasks or applications, it is 5 times faster than Intel CPUs, because from the beginning Apple wanted it to do so, proving optimal to the point of completion. good. That’s why ARM SoCs do more with less RAM than Intel CPUs and even Android operating systems.


apple-m1-111120201127--lg@2x.jpg

Rosetta 2 also plays a very important role, it will help software running on x86 also run well on ARM, even users won’t notice the difference in performance when used on Macs. running pure Intel x86 CPUs, and that was again Apple’s success. Rosetta 2 was conceived by Apple for a long time and was well prepared, as it is a vital part of Apple in bringing software that runs only on the x86 architecture to the new architecture, but also smoothly. but.


Rosetta2.jpg

Clearly, Intel’s power-efficient CPUs were completely beaten by Apple, and the playing field in Apple’s lowest-priced models is no longer Intel’s. What about the rest of Apple’s expensive and high-performance models? With what we’ve seen with the Apple M1, no one can be sure that after a few years of adulthood, the next generation of M-series hasn’t kicked Intel or even AMD off the field. function like iMac or Mac Pro.

How will Microsoft and Qualcomm compete?


Microsoft was the beginning of the game, when launching the Surface RT running SoC based on ARM architecture, or later the Surface Pro X combined with Qualcomm with the SoC SQ1 or SQ2. Microsoft does not fail to see the strengths and advantages of ARM over x86, they have seen for a long time, where is not Apple alone, but why Microsoft still failed? Direction for Microsoft at the present time to counter Apple. The answer for Microsoft is to restructure Windows.


SQ1.jpeg

Spin the wheel of time back to the old days, when x86 and ARM were fairly competitive. In essence, x86 uses complicated CISC instruction set, compared to ARM using simple instruction set RISC at that time, x86 had a clear advantage, and Microsoft customized Windows to run only on x86 from Intel or AMD. As time went on, ARM showed its superiority in performance / watt and battery life, it dominated the mobile market that Intel was trying to win, and Microsoft got into it. failure and the inevitable.

So in order to catch up with Apple, Microsoft had to restructure Windows, to make it compatible with ARM and a batch of software that followed. This will not be easy to do because Microsoft does not have as much experience and time, nor have the absolute control of both its hardware and software like Apple. Furthermore, Microsoft has to convince other OEMs like Dell, HP, Lenovo or Asus to use ARM like itself and must give a decent performance. Software remains a major hurdle for Microsoft.

Maybe the new 13-inch MacBook Air and MacBook Pro aren’t perfect, especially if you need more GPUs and extremely heavy tasks for an extended period of time. But look closely, when a $ 1000 laptop outperforms a 16-inch MacBook Pro over $ 2000, with 64GB of RAM and Intel’s flagship laptop CPU, better battery life, cooler and quieter in one. With a more compact body, how will competitors in the same segment have to compete?

Refer The Verge.

.



giahuy0308@outlook.com (BlackBerryz)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *