Russia advises NATO "expel the UK for the benefit of the US, the EU"

Russia advises NATO "expel the UK for the benefit of the US, the EU"


It should be recalled that on June 23, the Russian Army fired warning shots at the British destroyer HMS Defender (D36), which appeared in the area of ​​Cape Fiolent. The Russian Defense Ministry considers this action a serious violation of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention and urges London to conduct a thorough investigation of the crew’s actions to prevent similar incidents in the future.

The London side later said nothing serious had happened. Although the military of a nuclear-armed country clashing with another nuclear power could cause a Third World War.

At the same time, it is hard to believe that the British military coordinated their actions in Russian territorial waters with NATO headquarters in Brussels as well as leading members of the alliance. But it is not surprising that London still declared its support for Kiev.

Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba later said that Moscow’s actions were “a clear proof of Ukraine’s position: Russia’s aggressive and provocative policy in the Black Sea and Azov, occupation with troops Crimeanization is a constant threat to Ukraine and its allies. That is why I emphasize that a new quality interaction between NATO and Ukraine in the Black Sea is necessary.”

Faced with the above situation, according to the Russian press, we can say the following: Britain – as a member of NATO, along with Ukraine – a non-NATO member country, is taking advantage of the North Atlantic alliance Ocean for their own benefit.

The West – especially NATO member states should think about this. Do they want London to continue to harm them all? And should the UK continue to be part of the union?

Russia recommends NATO
Britain and Russia experienced an extremely serious clash near the Crimean peninsula

Firstly, This concerns Washington. The fact that the provocation by the British Army took place immediately after the meeting in Geneva between the US Presidents and Russia does not seem to be a coincidence.

London is not happy that the two leaders have begun to reach agreements, which may lead to the creation of systematic channels of dialogue, including on defense and security issues. So Britain took provocative actions to prevent Washington and Moscow from working constructively with each other. This is the first thing.

Monday, in the current situation, London is actually behaving like Turkey, whose unilateral action in Syria without warning its allies in the US and Europe caused a reaction in December 2019 and May 2021 by French President Emmanuel Macron – who warned that Ankara is causing NATO “brain death”.

Britain’s aggressive anti-Russian policy with Kiev’s involvement is also unacceptable to Germany, which is working with Paris and Moscow in a Normandy format in Ukraine.

Furthermore, as The Financial Times writes, German Chancellor Angela Merkel proposed one day to hold a meeting of EU leaders with Putin, which Macron supports, London is also working on this initiative. .

In effect, Britain aimed to replicate the effect of Fulton’s speech – delivered by Former Prime Minister Winston Churchill on March 5, 1946, and heralding the beginning of the Cold War, which had every chance of escalating. escalated into a hot war.

At first glance, in transferring political supremacy to Washington in post-World War II peacebuilding, London achieved its own benefit: forcing the Americans to see Britain as their main partner and preventing the United States from doing so. The United States as well as Europe negotiated with the Soviet Union.

According to the Russian side, in the interest of Washington, Berlin and Paris should prevent the intention of the “British-Ukrainian alliance” to repeat the scenario tested by London in 1946.

With regard to Kiev, NATO can establish a ban on the Ukrainian Army from participating in any exercises or activities of the alliance for a period of at least 5 years, as well as terminate political dialogue along the way. Kiev – NATO until Ukraine changes its anti-Russian stance.

As for London – to warn of the risk of unilateral action against Russia without extensive consultation with NATO member states, Russian media “suggested” Britain should withdraw from the North Atlantic military alliance.

Tung Duong

.

Related Posts