Huawei spoke out about the `` grand plan '' of U.S. rival 5G
World News

Huawei spoke out about the “ grand plan ” of U.S. rival 5G









->

Huawei spoke out about the “ grand plan ” of U.S. rival 5G

The U.S. intention of creating a 5G rival with Huawei could be ‘a challenge’.

This message was made by Paul Scanlan – Huawei’s leading network personnel in a conversation with CNBC.

This comment was made in the context of US lawmakers looking for a solution to replace Huawei in the development of next-generation networks.

Huawei’s 5G network development programs across the globe, especially Washington’s allies, have had a lot of difficulties when faced with fierce US opposition.

The 5G network is a next-generation mobile infrastructure development that promises super-fast data rates and the ability to consolidate some important infrastructure in the future. Washington persisted that Huawei posed a risk to national security because Beijing could use its equipment to spy. Huawei has repeatedly denied the allegations.

In addition to relying on Europe-based network giants Ericsson and Nokia, the United States is also seeking to replace Huawei network devices.

Huawei has invested heavily in 5G gamble

In an interview with CNBC, Paul Scanlan explained that the technical standards and actual implementation of 5G networks took about 10 years to develop.

“So the United States will do what the United States wants to do … it’s a very long game and it has its own complex process of construction. Huawei has solved it on its own.” , Mr. Scanlan said.

Asked whether the United States could create a new replacement of Huawei’s existing products quickly, Mr Scanlan said: “It will be a challenge.”

Republican Sen. Marco Rubio and a group of bipartisan lawmakers earlier this year introduced a bill aimed at providing more than $ 1 billion in investments in alternative products based on Western technology, to be able to knock off Chinese equipment suppliers Huawei and ZTE.

Meanwhile, Larry Kudlow, White House economic adviser, said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal that, “the concept of the big picture is to own all of 5G’s architecture and infrastructure. The US is primarily done by US companies, he said, adding that Ericsson and Nokia may be part of it.

The way to find alternatives

In the United Kingdom, Tobias Ellwood, a leading defense official in the House of Representatives, said Five Eyes – an intelligence alliance between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Britain and the United States – should develop a “product. rival to Huawei “owned by them.

“What I think we need to realize is that if we temporarily allow Huawei, we need to quickly create an alternative, which doesn’t exist now. So, you look at Cisco, Ericsson, Nokia, you need to combine these companies with some international funding to create our own 5G network, “the legislator said in a recent interview with Global Defense Technology magazine. .

U.S. lawmakers, including Mr. Rubio, have called on the government to promote an open source 5G architecture. As a result of this process, they claim, will allow new players to gamble network equipment on specific components, instead of competing with Huawei in the entire architecture.

There are several teams currently working on open source architecture, which allows companies to build their 5G technology on existing, publicly available infrastructure without having to start from scratch. But these groups have not had a great push.

“They don’t have a collective group as well as the standards … you know, there are a lot of complicated things in there. That doesn’t mean it can’t happen or it won’t happen but it matters. Most importantly, the United States has … not invested enough in this area of ​​technology, Mr. Scanlan said.

Another idea proposed by US Attorney General William Barr is for the government to take a controlling interest in Nokia, Ericsson or both.

Putting our big market and our financial weight behind one or both of these companies, will make it a much more formidable competitor and eliminate concerns about enduring strength. Their, Mr. Barr said.

Asked the possibility of the United States being able to carry out such a plan, Mr Scanlan said: “I cannot know whether it is a good or a bad thing or whether it is realistic or not.”

Peaceful

.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *