Execution of death sentence 'First China Visiting' - photo 1

Execution of the death penalty ‘First Chinese visit’ | World


As soon as the news broke out, the sensitive media immediately summed up that since the 18th China Communist Party Congress (November 2012), Lai Xiao Dan was the first official to be executed for crime of corruption. In 2019, Truong Trung Sinh, former deputy mayor of La Luong, Shanxi province, was held the death sentence by the Shanxi High Court during the appeal session. He was the first corrupt official to be sentenced to death in the mainland in eight years.

Strictly speaking, Zhang Zhongsheng was the first high-ranking Chinese official to be sentenced to death for economic crimes since the 18th Congress, since Xi Jinping came to power. However, Truong Trung Sinh, who was found to “accept bribes up to billions of yuan”, was sentenced to death in March 2018; By May 2019, the Shanxi Provincial High Court rejected the appeal, upheld the death sentence and submitted it to the Supreme People’s Court for approval, but so far the verdict has not been enforced. .

200 million yuan in cash was piled up in the cabinets in Lai Tieu Dan’s house

Xiao Dan never killed anyone, he was ostensibly executed because of a huge bribe of 1 billion 788 million yuan and hundreds of women. However, there are only 24 days from the time the death penalty was given to the execution of the sentence. Capital executions like this are very rare in China in recent years. In fact, China’s official media have also published comments confirming that the handling of Xiaojun is based on considerations to prevent “financial risk”.

Unlike CCTV that announced the death penalty execution of Lai Xiao Dan, which was explained as “showing the determination to run the party strictly”; the Xinhua News Agency’s comments to elevate politics were to “prevent and neutralize major financial risks”, saying it was “The bribery case involving the largest amount of money since the establishment of the People’s Republic The Chinese people ”,“ Finance is the core of the modern economy and the lifeblood of economic entities. Corruption in the financial sector is hidden, complex and extremely dangerous. Once a problem arises, it can have a major impact on the economy and even jeopardize social stability. Lai Tieu Dan’s law violation is a typical case of promoting anti-corruption in the financial sector … is a strong response to the anti-corruption demand of the era … “.

Before being ruled by the trial of the first instance, Lai Xiao Dan clearly hopes to use repentance in exchange for the government’s pity. He has met the anti-corruption thematic team “National Surveillance” and the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, are very cooperative and say what is asked to say.

A detail in the film related to the case of Lai Xiaojun is that the project team discovered a Lai Xiaoping house hiding stolen money in a district in Beijing, with many safes and more than 200 million yuan. Cash is kept. To avoid investigation, Lai Xiao Dan asked the bribe to give him cash. After receiving the money, he drove to this house himself, put it in the safe and then glided around a few times on the street to prevent being tracked. He and a few people close to have spoken of this house in slang terms, the “supermarket” …

In the film, Lai Tieu Dan recalls: “The financial industry is trading money every day, the bosses who contact me have hundreds of millions, billions, or tens of billions. They give me some money as a piece of cake … They also have many houses, so give me one. They say I support them a lot and help them grow. I also think it’s normal … or say this car is good, I like it, give it, I was very dazed at that time.

So who are those bosses with tens of billions? Under applicable Chinese laws and regulations, anyone committing bribery will be sentenced to imprisonment of no more than 5 years and a fine; who seeks improper benefits through bribery, if the case is serious or causes great damage to the national interests, shall be sentenced to between 5 and less than 10 years of imprisonment and a fine; If the case is particularly serious or in the national interest, they suffer particularly heavy losses, the offenders shall be sentenced to between over 10 years of imprisonment, life imprisonment, a fine or confiscation of property.

The Supreme Court’s special interpretation of this provision is: for illicit profiteering, the act of bribing state officials, causing economic losses of more than 5 million yuan, should be defined as ” causing great damage to the national interests “in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 390 of the Penal Code”.

And now, the main facts about Lai Xiaojun’s crimes officially announced by the Chinese media are: out of 22 bribery cases, three go to 200 million, 400 million and 600 million yuan. In addition, there were 6 cases of bribery with a value of more than 40 million yuan. So why are these nine “big boss” bribery of 200 million, 400 million, 600 million or more than 40 million yuan not disclosed publicly, let alone being handled before the law? That is what the public has been talking about during the past few days.

.


Related Posts