Can a person with COVID-19 be temporarily kept in an institution for a psychiatric evaluation?


Can a person with COVID-19 be temporarily kept in an institution for a psychiatric evaluation?







Share

Tweeter

Share

Email



“The request for custody in an establishment made under article 27 of the Civil Code of Quebec does not constitute an alternative mechanism for implementing the Public health law. “

This is what Judge Huppé recalled in a recent decision.

The Integrated University Health and Social Services Center of Nord-de-l’Île-de-Montréal (CIUSSS) wanted to be authorized to temporarily keep the defendant in an institution so that he undergoes a psychiatric evaluation. The latter was admitted to Fleury Hospital on 1er last January and was placed in preventive custody. Three days later, a doctor concluded that an interim custody order was necessary.

The hearing was held by video conference and the defendant, who is hearing impaired, answered his attorney’s questions by text message from his hospital bed. This brief testimony showed that he is lucid and able to interact with others using a means appropriate to his handicap. He refuses to continue to be hospitalized.

The CIUSSS request is based on article 27 of the Civil Code of Quebec. The conditions of application of this provision are as follows:

  • The person must present a danger to himself or to others;
  • This danger must be linked to his mental state;
  • The court must have serious grounds for concluding that such a danger exists;
  • The power given to the court to order custody for psychiatric assessment is discretionary.

There must therefore necessarily be a link between danger and mental state of the person concerned by the request.

As for the “serious reasons”, they most often come from the behavior of the person or from a recent change in this one or in his attitude, such as inexplicable acts of violence, a substantial change in mood or an obvious loss. contact with reality.

The person does not have to justify his refusal to consent to a psychiatric evaluation nor to demonstrate his mental health.

In this case, the evidence presented by the CIUSSS as to the danger that the defendant could represent is limited to the fact thathe has COVID-19 and that’he does not respect the confinement instructions. Having contracted COVID-19 poses a risk to people with whom it may be in contact, but this danger does not arise from his mental state. Rather, it is the provisions of the Public health law that govern this situation.

It is therefore incumbent on the public authorities to take the appropriate measures to protect the Quebec population if the defendant represents a danger due to the fact that he has COVID-19.

To learn more about the interim custody orders issued in the context of the current pandemic, I invite you to read my post from May 2020.

References

Nord-de-l’Île-de-Montréal Integrated University Health and Social Services Center c. MD (CQ, 2021-01-07), 2021 QCCQ 25, SOQUIJ AZ-51734787. As of the date of the broadcast, the decision had not been appealed.







Share

Tweeter

Share

Email

3 responses on “Can we temporarily keep a person with COVID-19 in an institution for a psychiatric evaluation?”

  1. Sonia calouche says:

    In this specific case, should the doctor notify the public authorities, the police, to enforce the law?

    Reply

  2. Sylvie Lalonde says:

    From my point of view, the fact of not submitting to health instructions is not a matter of justice, obviously everyone knows that COVID represents a danger to the physical and mental health of any individual because of the fact that it is contagious and that the risk of contagion risks infecting other individuals and by the same fact in some caused death, but from my point of view, this case is the responsibility of the police, people should have tickets, it is not is that by paying for some that they end up understanding, we cannot keep someone against their will, and bring to justice a problem that is the unwillingness of an individual to respect the sanitary instructions, otherwise many would be in violation . No, it is up to the police to monitor compliance with health instructions and to issue tickets, but do the police still play their role or do they prefer the delegate to the judge in this case.

    Reply

  3. Sylvie Lalonde says:

    Sometimes we don’t know why but people are taken to the wrong authorities, it’s a whole system, the police should deal with tickets when people do not comply with the sanitary rules, and not the health system, all for nothing.

    Reply

leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Mandatory fields are indicated with *



Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *